Every morning while feeding J, I listen to the 7 o’clock news on ABC Classic FM. Sometimes I get the 8 o’clock bulletin as well. Every morning for the last several, the first headline concerns the newest wikileak leak. Call me boring, but I’m getting bored.
In any case it has got me trying to think Christianly (that is, biblically) about the whole thing. What is a Christian response to this world ‘scandal’? Here’s my simple proposition; gracious interaction invited.
Firstly, Christians are pro freedom of speech; Christians championed and still champion it. Freedom of speech goes hand-in-hand with freedom of religion – which is something else Christians fight hard for. (There are many countries in our world that don’t offer this basic right to their citizens – you can find out more by watching this 3-minute video from Open Doors.) These rights stem from the fact that humans are created in God’s image, giving us intrinsic dignity and worth as well as ability to think and know and decide. To have these opportunities taken away from us constitutes oppression of our humanity at a very basic level.
So if we’re pro freedom of speech, and wikileaks is (apparently) all about freedom of speech, are we pro wikileaks?? Well perhaps, if wikileaks is on about demonstrating to the world that its leaders have feet of clay. But the Bible tells me that loud and clear, and I’m not terribly sure what good (in the truest sense of the word) it does me (and the world) to know it in glaring and blow-by-blow detail. We already know our world is fallen, that humans say stupid things, that countries that seem to be at peace are actually (sort of) at war, and that we need wisdom and discernment to live and respond well in such a world. I don’t think we need wikileaks to give us its kind of background information in order to live well!
So while we’re pro freedom of speech, we’re not supposed to be pro forms of that freedom that (tend to) destroy rather than build, that ‘hate’ rather than ‘love’. Our ethic as Christians is to test the goodness of something by whether it promotes love for God and/or for neighbour – ie. whether it does good to or for God or people. And the substance of this ‘good’ is usually taught or shown to us in God’s word – our authority for this ethic in the first place.
So basically my conclusion is that ABC news – and many other media outlets no doubt – simply continue to fuel a fire, needlessly. And that Christians need to be humble, knowing that we all have feet of clay, and knowing that God will one day judge all of us for our words and actions. And that if we want to continue to champion freedom of speech and religion (as we should!), there are great organisations that help us advocate for these things on a national and international level, in a way that does good to others – because what good does it do to me, you, Australia or Afghanistan to know that Mr Rudd said this or that when he was PM.



Recent Comments